Friday, September 2, 2011

The Father of Oleander Soup - Part 2 of the Oleander Series


!±8± The Father of Oleander Soup - Part 2 of the Oleander Series

In the previous article, "a surprising discovery in Turkey," the first of this series of articles about oleander, I described how Dr. HZ old Ozell a cure for cancer and other conditions found in rural Turkey in 1960 and after treatment with thousands of patients successfully over the past 40 years, Dr. Ozel patented the medicine and was entered into FDA trials. Unfortunately, after having passed Phase I testing, the patented medicine known as Anvirzellanguished for lack of funds (many patented look of an old remedy and common plant-based low) and inter-company squabbles - and can take many years, if ever, before this promising cancer fighter reaches the market as an approved FDA drug.

The good news is that there is no need to wait for the approved drug because you can make your own oleander extract at home stove, based on the original patent by Dr. Ozel and folk medicinethat used for thousands of years. Oleander is a naturally growing plant found throughout southern and southwestern United States and in many parts of the world, and if it is not always of course in your area, you can order oleander plants from many mail-order nurseries of Internet. (There are also complete at least three sources for a commercial version I know, but this must be for the next installment of this series to wait.).

Yes, it is possible yourto create your own oleander remedy, such as "oleander soup" at home about as easily as a big pot of beans, and it is known, is possible thanks to a personal injury lawyer named Edward F. Hensley, from San Antonio, Texas, which I call the "Father of Oleander Soup".

In 2002, the mother of Ed with liver cancer and small cell lung, and a sister diagnosed with Hepatitis-C. Ed's sister, Catrina (Cat), began researching and networking with their friends for answers to the doctor's prognosis that BettyHensley has had to live only a few months. After contacting one of his old friends, had a clinic in Honduras she could contact and discuss a new cancer drug has been in San Antonio, said. Cat made a few phone calls and discovered that the drug order. It cost $ 1500.00 for six weeks supply of so-called Anvirzel (TM). Cat, Ed, and his brother John in the first fund and the drug was ordered.

Betty was seeing oncologist in San Antoniodiscuss the risks of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the fact that, in advanced stages, it would be only a small chance of extending his life, and a great chance of serious side effects, including destroying her immune system. However, it has to search for chemotherapy for several weeks, to no avail. If the Anvirzel (TM) arrived, they started the injection to help with the cat, made according to the instructions of the medical facility Honduras. After three weeks she went in for new scanswith her oncologist. The new films showed the tumors in both lungs and her liver were shrinking. The doctor could not participate directly in the injections, but agreed that the pharmaceutical research.

When the offer was about 6 weeks away, and Betty was very sore at the site of their injections and began to explore what this new drug has been done, and what it will do long-term use, and cost. The FDA had a letter published on its website, warning of the drug, made from the oleanderPlant, saying it was not proven and should not be used. But the clinic in Honduras was reporting many successful cures of several types of cancer, including childhood brain tumors.

And was determined to find out what research in medicine, and went to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Web site and with the notion Anvirzel. After some research, found the Ed. patent. It was written about 39 pages of German jurists, in the language of patent attorneys who charge $ 400 an hour for writingPatents, the courage to read only lawyers and scientists.

After several weeks of part-time studies, the patent began to make sense. It was just a big mess, too detailed and exaggerated method of making a soup from the leaves and stems of a common plant, oleander. No problem. Ed had huge oleander trees in his backyard, which were very healthy ornamentals with beautiful flowers all year round. Making the soup was as simple as getting a pot, some cutters, electricHot meal and a place to cook. And his wife Carol would not allow him to cook in the kitchen, so Ed resigned his room outside storage, a storage building 10x18 feet, construction equipment and seasonal sports equipment was. After burning several pots of soup because the heat was too high, Ed turned the heat and boil the water and oleander clippings for four hours. Then he took the leaves and stems, and strained the remaining broth, using paper towels and plastic filters. By Dr.Ozel patented the method, let the broth cool before pressing. He then cooked slowly until the broth is only about a fifth of the original liquid in the bottom of the 12-pot was left.

And measured the specific gravity of such a freeze, which shows the measurements on a small scale. It 'was where Dr. Ozel recommended in the patent, as thin as chicken soup broth. Next, 10 feeder mice purchased and given the new liquid, which Ed named "oleanderSoup "you could eat as their only source of liquid for two weeks with all the food of the mouse. The mice gained weight, were somewhat sluggish, but remained alive and looking good.

Mother and has been adopted by its range of Anvirzel at this point, so that the broth of a bottle of Ed Bettys house for a confrontation with their medications. It looked the same. Tasted the same. The new soup was not fresh, freeze-dried and re-established, and to Betty, tasted fresher. Ed went first andtried some, about a teaspoon. Betty then tried it with a teaspoon full. She said she liked the fresh version, and that was it. She took oral doses three times daily with meals, with diarrhea the only side effect that subsided after a week.

Her tests three weeks later were surprising, showing the tumors were still in decline and were almost gone. A month later, she had no cancer at all. Betty out in the soup for another month after his doctor saidwas free of cancer.

Unfortunately, some eight months later, feeling healthy and energetic, Betty flopped down on the bed for a nap, and felt collar bone snap. Tests showed cancer in the bones, and was aggressive. Her oncologist referred her to another doctor who recommended some strong new chemotherapy, and discouraged them to pull back on the oleander. In two months the chemo had bone cancer was slow, but had also destroyed her kidneys. He died a monthas a result of renal failure, not a further decline Anvirzel oleander soup or who had previously saved his life. But his oncologist of trust, which was very nice and very addictive. Fortunately, Betty has her life up to 88 years. He had a heavy day bicomponent a smoker's father Ed gave him a cigarette when she was 18. He died at 61 from coronary heart disease, are directly linked to his heavy smoking.

Catrina was busy with hepatitis C, severe liverCondition, which often leads to liver cancer. They began manufacturing their own oleander soup and took it in the hope that it would terminate its condition. He did. In less than two months, his hepatitis C was gone. His liver function tests were normal. It is not more than two years ago. She has the recipe with doctors from Mexico, the treatment of poor patients with AIDS, cancer, psoriasis, hepatitis C and divided. Her friend told her the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis is gone with the houseTo remedy the situation. He laughs when he describes the scene in her kitchen, with a large boiling pot leaf and two Mexican brothers, medical doctors, are known to us, as something not as difficult as "Borax beans" or chicken mole, two favorite Mexican dishes cook.

Later, in 2003, Ed was surfing the Internet looking for websites that "Anvirzel" refers. He found the Minnesota Wellness Directory site and read their comments on how good the prospects were for thispoisonous oleander leaves from the new fact. And is the host of the recipe and a brief summary of his research by e-mail. After the host, David Bonello, explores the concept and the soup recipe, including more and opinions of his friends and medical herbalist, has published the recipe on his website in its June 2003 newsletter, with warnings about their use.

Since 2003, many people have used the recipe to make your own oleander soup, among friends and relatives by Ed Hensley,David Bonello and the author. None of them has a serious side effect reported, and many of them reported that their cancer and other diseases had disappeared or were greatly improved.

Later in this series: The Recipe for Oleander Soup

Live long, live healthy, live happy!


The Father of Oleander Soup - Part 2 of the Oleander Series

!8!# Generators Home Depot Purchase Top Brands at a Great Value Now. Promotions Maytag Front Loading Washers Philips Heartstart Free Shipping




6 comments:

  1. All human studies done with oleander have shown in to be a failure. The only positive studies were in Petri dishes, which found oleander cardiac glycosides to be effective against SOME cancer cell lines. The cardiac glycosides though are highly toxic and removed in "oleander soup".

    Even if the toxic cardiac glycosides were to be ingested this still does not mean they will cancer cells. Petri dish studies are not the same as human studies since Petri dishes do not have a metabolism. The cardiac glycosides are metabolized in the body. I have posted on the "oleander soup" fraud a number of times in the past.

    Here are some examples:

    "Those "case reports" are unverifiable testimonials. There is no way to see if the people even exist and if they do what their long term prognosis was. If they died a week after Dr. Ozel treated them he could still write his report but it means nothing. And where are these people. I would think if these people really existed and were alive they would be all over the news media and even sites like YouTube touting their survival. This is not happening though."

    "I have heard all this hype by Tony Isaacs, who I feel is clueless. Ozel supporters have used the same few testimonials over and over. If Ozel was so successful then why have there been no more testimonials? Where are the survivors so the successes can be verified. Why have all human clinical trials conducted shown that oleander is a failure in treating cancer? Tony never answered me either on how he claims it takes months to start seeing results yet Ozel claims a cure in 11 days. How is this?"

    "All of the studies completed showed no significant effect. This included the most recent phase 1 study conducted at MD Anderson. Look at the study to also see the conflict of interest. Despite this the drug will still found to be ineffective. Unfortunately there is a scammer going around the internet posting everywhere that the study was successful and showed oleander was effective against a wide range of cancers. The study got nowhere close to doing either one of those."

    "Oleander DOES NOT work. All the human studies on oleander for cancer have shown it's a failure. The studies were misinterpreted by Tony Isaacs to make the failures appear as successes. And if you read the studies carefully you will see conflicts of interest and the studies were manipulated. For instance where they say "Of the 15 evaluable pts.(patients)". "Of the"? So they selected certain patients out of the whole test. The ones that showed any kind of beneficial response. Scientific fraud!"

    "Cont. At least Tony Isaac's censoring the evidence proving him wrong inspired me to write a book on holistic cancer therapies so he cannot censor the truth there. There will be a whole chapter dedicated to the quack oleander treatment with an explanation of what the studies really found since Isaacs had no clue and totally misinterpreted the studies to make them appear successful when they really showed a complete failure. Isaacs has no medical or science background I have ever seen."

    "Do a Google search for "wordpress oleander Isaacs" and this will bring up my blog articles discussing the myths that oleander has been proven effective for cancer in humans. I also address the studies done on this, which all show oleander was a failure. The problem is that Isaacs does not have a medical background and does not know how to properly interpret studies. So he is reporting successes on oleander trials that simply do not exist."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey James,
      I talked to a guy who used it. I contacted him in 2007 and he was ill first in 1994.So think about it.

      Delete
    2. So what? Were you there personally to watch exactly what he did? That is a major problem with claims like this. When people hear the word cancer they tend to panic and do MULTIPLE things such as changes in diet, quitting smoking, supplements and various herbs, various therapies, etc. Some of these, unlike "oleander soup", which has been proven to be quackery, actually work. Then people assume whatever worked even though it was proven not to.

      Answer me this. How come all the human studies, including those funded by the manufacturer have proven that oleander DOES NOT kill cancer cells in humans?

      Delete
  2. So what? When people get cancer they tend to panic and they use MULTIPLE therapies then give credit to one thing even if there is no basis for it to work.

    I have run in to this many times where someone claimed they cured themselves with something proven not to work. Then when you start questioning them more and more on their claim it finally came out that they did other things that does have evidence of working.

    As another example there are a lot of people also pushing cesium chloride as a cancer cure even though it has only been found to cause and promote cancer as well as cause heart and liver issues. These people will quote part a particular study that claims success with cesium chloride. If you read the actual study though you will find the success rate was rather low and the people were put on numerous therapies art once along with the cesium chloride.

    There is also the issue that there is no way to verify stories. This person could be making things completely up. After all if oleander really worked then where are the thousands of people sharing their stores. After all it was claimed that Ozel cured hundreds of thousands of people in the past and how many people have tried this since? Yet all that I have seen are the same bogus I think it was 11 "testimonials".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Those people do come forward. Then people like the AMA, FDA and like you discredit their testimonies. There's no money in the cure. There's money in the medicine. Just ask Johnson & Johnson. They lost in court for talc powder targeted at women and children. The talc was starting to show up in ovarian cancer. J&J new this. It was proven in a court document company memo. Did they stop??? Hell no!!!
    They had Jansen their Pharma company get started on a ovarian cancer chemo therapy drug. Which guess what??? It just got approved by the FDA!!! So it will be put on the drug protocol list for "approved" medications" for ovarian cancer!!
    In the mean time their still trying to give babies now vaccines as early as the age of 1yrs old a "vaccine" for ovarian cancer!?! Clearly they don't need it!! Just stop using the OTC crap they sell in stores!!
    You just keep feeding big Pharma man!! They like your kind!!! The scared and the weak!! Afraid to go out on your own and think for themselves!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Where? With hundreds of thousands supposedly cured as the claims go they should be all over YouTube and in the media. I have yet to see any.

      Maybe because of the fact that this is complete quackery as all the human studies, including those funded by the manufacturer, have proven.

      And once again "testimonials" ARE NOT evidence as I already explained since there is no way to to confirm the stories nor to know all what therapies the person used or changes they made.

      And this is not about talcum powder. When people use diversionary techniques like this it shows they have NO evidence to back their claims.

      If I am wrong then show me some REAL evidence!!!!

      Delete


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。







Sponsor Links